RFP29524003 Funding Model Review Closed

The BCER has not disclosed the budget related to this solicitation and proponents are expected to provide their total price for the delivery of proposed services.

Recommendations should include funding of hydrogen, methanol and ammonia activities.

No - best practices should relate to similar relevant funding models.

If recommended by the successful proponent, new revenue streams would be considered.

Yes.

Proponents are expected to determine a sufficient number of similar projects or consulting engagements to detail as providing relevant experience.

At this time, detailed calculations are not required to determine exact revenue fee and/or levy amounts. Recommendations may need to include analysis over the estimated impact on revenue volatility and estimated proportion of total funding by proposed revenue source(s).

Proponents are expected to apply judgment to determine the level of understanding that would be sufficient to provide relevant recommendations.

One round of industry consultation is expected to be sufficient to understand industry issues and input. This may be carried out through industry associations to provide a representation of stakeholders. This is not expected to impact project timelines.

Existing revenue sources listed can are open to improvement where the successful proponent is able to support recommended options for refinement or alternative revenue sources.