Orphan Site Management Restoration Services Closed

It is expected that the successful proponents would have the capacity to provide both the supervision and execution.

Standing offers will be created under both workstreams that will encompass all or part of the services offered based upon resources (qualifications) and availability.

The Contractor would be responsible for all materials.

Operations would have to be BC certified.

All submissions will receive full consideration once mandatory criteria is confirmed.

Then, based upon the piece that is being bid upon, each submission is scored individually using the table as a guide. Theirs is no set answer, only a desire by the Regulator to fairly evaluate proponents to ensure best value for the money that is spent.

Once individual scores are generated, the group will come together and agree upon a consensus score for all components except the pricing which is analyzed independently by our finance team.

Once this entire process is complete, a cut-off point is decided that allows us to on-board as many contractors as needed to cover the work plan for the upcoming budget cycles.

Each scope will be evaluated independently based on specific criteria.

Most consulting firms will have better rates than the OGC.

Daily updates for field during active projects and weekly for costs.

There is no set page limit, but files will need to be sized to ensure submission through the procurement portal.

Sometimes yes and sometimes we will work following the abandonment and decommissioning of sites. It will be site and scope specific.

Yes.

Include all assumptions (including well depth) to provide indication of scope of work and cost development.

It is up to the proponent to document certain assumptions to provide indication of scope of work and cost development.

In situ.

Yes.